This individual may not have been aware of the dividing line from June 8th where White reviewed an episode of Worldview Weekend Radio which was broadcast the day before.Might be because no one has ever heard of you til this retweet— Glenn Hendrickson (@glenn_h) June 26, 2017
Ex: his intentional misrepresentation of the nature of the interfaith dialog
A quick review of the Dividing Line produced a list of lies (ranging from inaccurate statements to intentional misrepresentations) about White by Howse.
Some of them were from the text description, others from the audio. It seemed my example of Howse's misrepresentation of the nature of the dialog between White and Yasir Qadhi was insufficient. So I made him a list.Enjoy Howse's lies. Just the ones I was able to find anyways... pic.twitter.com/IpjAkM0Qj9— Glenn Hendrickson (@glenn_h) June 26, 2017
The list contained statements 1) made by Brannon Howse, 2) about James White, 3) which were not true. You would think this met his criteria for an example. But Mr. Jackson seems to retain his right to dismiss anything for no reason.
He then asks for examples of lies from the guests on Howse's show, Shahram Hadian and Usama Dakdok. It just so happens I had a few jotted down.These aren't a list of lies but of baseless allegations without any documented proof. Big difference Glenn. @WVWOnline @UsamaDakdok https://t.co/Cb5hgfJOP0— Gregg Jackson (@GreggMJackson) June 26, 2017
Will this be sufficient? Some of these statements about things White said are demonstrably false. Misquoting someone you disagree with causes a serious blow to your credibility. No one is saying that Jackson, Howse, or anyone else has to agree with White. We are saying that your disagreement ought to be based on 1) what actually happened (not what you wish had happened) or 2) what White actually said (not what you misquote him as having said).Presented for your uncritical dismissal pic.twitter.com/6OTxCGjGCh— Glenn Hendrickson (@glenn_h) June 26, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment